Sample Rogerian Argument Now that you have had the chance to learn about Rogerian arguments, it’s time to see what a Rogerian argument might look like. Below, you’ll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to APA 7 th edition guidelines, with a particular emphasis on Rogerian elements Jan 26, · A Rogerian argument takes this idea and applies it to the essay format. A Rogerian essay structure acknowledges that a subject can be looked at from different standpoints. When to Use This Type of Argument A Rogerian argument works best when the essay subject is one where people have strong, opposing blogger.comted Reading Time: 2 mins A Rogerian essay is meant to help students understand issues from two different perspectives to come up with an agreeable solution. According to Carl Roger’s effort in describing human traits, a Rogerian essay is based on the assumption that the writer needs to acknowledge other varied views by enabling readers to see some valid points about an opposing view
Rogerian Argument // Purdue Writing Lab
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. Rogerian essay format rights reserved.
This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rogerian essay format, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals, rogerian essay format.
For example, if you wanted to watch a comedy and your friend wanted to watch a romance, you might compromise by offering to watch a rom-com, as this offers each of you a bit of what you are looking for in that particular moment. Note, however, that this style of argument is decidedly less common in academic settings, rogerian essay format, where various empirical or theoretical notions of truth are often prized above the practical advantages of the Rogerian method.
While Aristotelian styles of argument are often seen as eristic concerned primarily with winningthe Rogerian argument can be viewed as more dialectic in nature a conversation between two or more parties with the goal of arriving at some mutually-satisfying solution.
Thus, practicing the Rogerian argument will enhance your ability to understand the complex relations of opposing viewpoints and provide tools for addressing such discrepancies sympathetically. However, Rogerian argument does come with disadvantages. For example, because Rogerian argument relies on compromise between opposing parties, it may not work well when your opponents are unwilling or unable to compromise, or if they are arguing in bad faith e.
The first aim shows the reader that you understand the complexities of the argument and that you have listened sympathetically to what it is they have to say.
This is important, rogerian essay format, because the success of the Rogerian arguments relies on cooperation and collaboration. The second aim puts this understanding into practice by seeking a symbiotic solution. The third aim builds ethos and rapport between the parties. If audiences believe they share a value system with a speaker or writer, rogerian essay format, they are more likely to agree to the terms of whatever solution is presented.
While each of these aims is important, Young, Becker, and Pike stress that they are just that: aims, not steps. You should not necessarily view these aims as occurring in a linear, step-by-step process. The authors present a synthesized discussion of what a successful Rogerian argument should contain, but they eschew any formalized structure.
The structure of the argument should instead be determined by the speaker, and it should be modified and adapted according to the rhetorical situation at hand. Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument.
In this example, we will take the position that technology e. In so doing, we should be able to arrive at a solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving our goal of allowing technology in the classroom. Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention, rogerian essay format.
We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, and discuss the implications closely considering all perspectives rogerian essay format arrive at a solution that works for everyone. Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom.
Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. We want to show that we are fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will rogerian essay format similar value to our opinions. We could include statistics, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction. Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology rogerian essay format be allowed in the writing classroom.
We would still want to speak as objectively as possible in order to establish our ethos as concerned but unbiased speaker. We might even qualify our position by acknowledging that there are, of course, situations in which technology should rogerian essay format put away, rogerian essay format, but reiterate that, rogerian essay format, generally speaking, the presence of digital technology is a positive. For example, we could gather testimony from students who claim that using these technologies in class has been beneficial.
We could include research and scholarship that supports our position and even quote instructors who have developed pedagogy around these technologies. We might even subtly demonstrate that our opposition has failed to account for all possibilities by choosing our examples carefully. For instance, we could easily include accounts of students with learning disabilities who might otherwise have a difficult time succeeding in class without the help of assistive technologies.
We would acknowledge that some instructors do not want digital technologies present in the classroom, as they believe they distract from paying attention during lectures. We would maintain, however, that these technologies can indeed be productive tools for learning—in some cases, they can even be a virtual requirement for learning.
We could then offer a solution: that these digital technologies should be kept aside during lecture portions of a lesson except rogerian essay format the case of students with documented disabilities.
This way, students will likely be paying attention, taking notes by rogerian essay format which they can transcribe later if they so wish. However, once a class moves from lecture to activity whether group or individualstudents should be allowed to access these technologies rogerian essay format more effectively engage with the activity, organize their thoughts, and access information.
Now that the instructor is no longer lecturing, it should be easier to monitor student progress and engagement and the use of technology for these activities will lead to more developed and better organized results from the students. Find Info For Find Info For Academics Admissions Current Students Athletics About Careers Prospective Students Research and Partnerships Quick Links Apply News President Shop Visit Give Emergency.
Purdue Online Writing Lab College of Liberal Arts. Writing Rogerian essay format Purdue OWL Research Contact Site Map. General Writing Academic Writing Historical Perspectives on Argumentation. Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University.
Rogerian Argument The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. Contents Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument.
Introduction Here, we rogerian essay format introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. Opposing position Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. Context for opposing position Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument.
Your Position Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom.
Explanation of Rogerian Argument Outline
, time: 9:19Creating a Rogerian Argument Essay Structure - BrightHub Education
Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument. A successful Rogerian argument will likely include the following: Introduction (addressing the topic to be discussed and/or the problem to be solved) A Rogerian essay is meant to help students understand issues from two different perspectives to come up with an agreeable solution. According to Carl Roger’s effort in describing human traits, a Rogerian essay is based on the assumption that the writer needs to acknowledge other varied views by enabling readers to see some valid points about an opposing view Jan 26, · A Rogerian argument takes this idea and applies it to the essay format. A Rogerian essay structure acknowledges that a subject can be looked at from different standpoints. When to Use This Type of Argument A Rogerian argument works best when the essay subject is one where people have strong, opposing blogger.comted Reading Time: 2 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment