Film Analysis Of The Film 12 Angry Men Words | 5 Pages This essay will explore the Oscar-winning United artist film 12 Angry Men directed by Sydney Lumet; with a thorough evaluation of how successfully the narrative reflects tensions in s America. 12 Angry Men is renowned for its strong linear narrative and the ability to obtain the attention of the audience with the use of only one mise-en · 12 Angry Men Analysis. Topics: 12 Angry Men, Jury, Not proven Pages: 6 ( words) Published: August 16, The movie 12 Angry Men was released in Its opening scene is in a courtroom where the judge is giving directions to the jury. An 18 year old boy has been accused of murdering his father with a knife The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen-year-old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send
Critical Analysis of Twelve Angry Men Movie Free Essay Example
The action revolves around the opinions, perceptions, reason and logic of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide. The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. This play was made into a movie inproduced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay.
This essay will explore some of the elements of Critical thinking found within the context of this remarkable movie, and will show that rational reason and logic when used effectively can overcome the mostly ineffective rush to judgement that can be prevalent in a population. Within the movie, it can be seen that persuasive argument is employed by one single juror to help sway the majority to believe his analysis of the evidence presented, He sets on a course to reach out to each juror and improve their thinking by reasonable and justified persuasion, Chaffee tells us that we can improve our thinking in an organised and systematic way by Carefully examining our thinking process and the thinking process of others By focusing our attention on various thinking approaches and strategies, 12 angry men analysis essay, we can learn to think more effectively Practicing our thinking abilities.
To improve our thinking, we actually have to think for ourselves, to explore and make sense 12 angry men analysis essay thinking situations by using our thinking abilities. Although it is important to read about thinking and learn how other people think, there is no substitute for actually doing it ourselves.
Chaffee p47 The movie has a simple premise, 12 angry men analysis essay, that a minority may affect a majority if rational thought and logic are used to construct arguments based on sound reasons and that when this is applied to lalse logic or fallacies that these can be changed.
There were three points raised in the trial that Juror 8 believed required argument analysis, 1, 12 angry men analysis essay. The knife that was the murder weapon was unique and the boy was seen with it, although he said he had lost it. That the old lady saw the boy kill his father through her window, whilst a train was passing. Juror 8 analyses each of these points and makes credible arguments that the conclusion is flawed based on incorrect reasoning, by pointing out inconsistencies in the conclusions reached.
The other jurors are content to believe that their reasoning is solid, 12 angry men analysis essay, as they have used examples of deductive reasoning to reach their conclusion.
Chaffee tells about deductive reasoning. The deductive argument is the one most commonly associated with the study of logic. Though it has a variety of valid forms, they all share 12 angry men analysis essay characteristic: If you accept the supporting reasons also called premises as true, then you must necessarily accept the conclusion as true.
Chaffee p During the course of the debate within the jury room Juror 8 summarises the evidence presented and the conclusions drawn by his fellow jurors, by asking questions like, what do we know about that?
Or what does this show? He analyses the content, by breaking down the component parts and analysing each point through examination of what has been presented. He then synthesises the content by pulling together what he had summarized, and analysed and discusses it with the input of the other jurors. Finally he reaches an evaluation, and presents this to his peers on the jury as a reasonable version of events.
This process as described in Troyka, Hesse of Sumarise, analyse, synthesise and evaluate, marks juror 8 out from the rest of the jury as the most effective 12 angry men analysis essay thinker as he engages in this process throughout the movie. The antithesis to Juror 8 may be Juror 3 as portrayed by Lee J. We get the impression that he has made his mind up and has settled on a verdict of guilty to satisfy some personal feelings. He is shown to be morally conflicted.
The question of morals and ethics also run a current theme through the movie. The sketching of the characters lead the audience to decide who is morally conflicted or not, 12 angry men analysis essay. Within the characters there are overt moral and ethical issues raised. The subject of the movie is essentially a moral or ethical question, it asks us the audience, what would you do? Asking us to invoke our values and assumptions, and find the truth amongst the evidence presented.
The movie gives us various characters of differing levels in society all bound together for one purpose, to find the truth in the evidence given which may result in a death sentence for the accused.
The varying personalities and degrees of moral fortitude is evident from their reactions. Another ethical issue is the use of persuasion by juror 8 who seems intent on turning the jury to find with him, he uses methods that may be ethically unsound to sway other easily pliable members of the jury his way to gain momentum to use against his most fervent foes on the panel. The burden of proof is the most difficult in law it is beyond a reasonable doubt, and Juror 8 who through 12 angry men analysis essay and logic, who sees through the fallacies and falsehoods created by those in the room, who sows the seeds of 12 angry men analysis essay through the analysis and synthesis of the evidence provided, leads the group to a single conclusion.
We as an audience are also left with the narrative as was unfolded, and it is down to us whether we believe that the truth was uncovered or whether it was just a matter of objective persuasion and therefore whether the ends justify the means.
Critical Analysis of Twelve Angry Men Movie. Accessed May 31, Critical Analysis of Twelve Angry Men Movie Categories: Critical Thinking Epistemology Ethics Jury Movie Reason. Download paper. Analysis, Pages 7 words. Turn in your highest-quality paper Get a qualified writer to help you with. Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper. Deadline: 10 days left. Number of pages. Email Invalid email.
Get quality help now. Verified writer. Proficient in: Critical Thinking. Cite this page Critical Analysis of Twelve Angry Men Movie. Related Essays. Stay Safe, Stay Original. Not Finding What You Need? Please enter something FIND ESSAY. Copying content is not allowed on this website.
ASK writer FOR HELP. Give us your email and we'll send you the essay you need. Send me the sample. By clicking Send Me The Sample you agree to the terms and conditions of our service.
We'll not send you spam or irrelevant messages. Please indicate where to send you the sample. Please check your inbox. go to my inbox. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible, 12 angry men analysis essay.
Get Your Job Done By a Professional Skilled Expert. HIRE Writer. Money Back Guarantee.
Character Analysis for 12 Angry Men (1957)
, time: 11:30
· United States: MGM Studios – Video DVD) This approach to filmmaking gives us, the viewers, an open, deeply penetrating and affecting exposure to the personalities, personal baggage, points-of-view, quirks, cold bloodedness and visions of the twelve jurors. 12 Angry Men () is a master study of group dynamics and change based on both 20th Century and 21st Century · 12 Angry Men Analysis. Topics: 12 Angry Men, Jury, Not proven Pages: 6 ( words) Published: August 16, The movie 12 Angry Men was released in Its opening scene is in a courtroom where the judge is giving directions to the jury. An 18 year old boy has been accused of murdering his father with a knife The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen-year-old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send
No comments:
Post a Comment